SUMMARY EDUARDO LIGHT This article has as intention to show, Nietzsche as philosopher of the questioning of the moral, and one I criticize fierce of the Christian moral and with enormous repugnance to the Christianity and the priests, beyond the search for the concepts of the words ' ' good and mau' ' citing and commenting some subjects for boarded them where if explicit that, men must get rid themselves of the fetters predem that them, beyond commentaries of other philosophers regarding the moral. Words Keys: Moral, Christian, Good Moral and Bad INTRODUCTION Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche was born the 15 of October of 1844 in Rcken, next locality the Leipzig. Karl Ludwig, its father, cultured and delicate person, and its two grandmothers were protestant shepherds; the proper Nietzsche thought about following the same career. By the same author: The Related Companies. In 1849, its father and its brother faleceram; because of this the mother changed itself with the family for Naumburg, small city to the edges of the Saale, where Nietzsche grew, in company of the mother, two aunts and of the grandmother. Happy child, pupil model, docile and loyal, its schoolmates called it ' ' small pastor' ' ; with them it created a small artistic and literary society, for which it composed melodies and it wrote its first verses. In 1858, Nietzsche got a scholarship in then the famous school of Pforta, where they had studied the Novalis poet the Fichte philosopher (1762-1814). They date of this time its readings of Schiller (1759-1805), Hlderlin (1770-1843) and Byron (1788-1824); under this influence and of some professors, Nietzsche started to move away itself from the Christianity. He is aparti of this removal of Nietzsche of the Christianity, that it starts if he becomes one I criticize fierce of the moral placing, that the biggest problem of the philosophy, is problems of value, problems this that Nietzsche always was come across in its workmanships. .

Its children are involved in tragedies, between them the episode of one of them to have raped the proper sister, son of Davi with another mother. Later, this son was assassinated by a brother. If he had not been magnetized for the golden glory and that the church conferred it for all these centuries; for the opposite, if it lived today, under gide of the moral values contemporaries and under the prism of all the historical building of laws and institutions that civilize the men, Davi still would be seen as a hero? Or would be one crpula? Would deserve it honor to have been sculptured for a Michelangelo? Oh, pulguinha does not stop to cry out in my ear, it wants that I say. Not, pulguinha. I am against the barbarity, am against Hitler and all the imperialistas governing.

I am against Davi, Alexander, the Great one, Jlio Cesar and Napoleo. All they had been murderous. At least it is what it says the my sensitivity to me molded for the civilizatrios values contemporaries. Who knows if I was Jewish at the time of Davi, I would adore it to I. Or Macedonian in the times of Alexander, the Great one; Roman in the years of Jlio Cesar; Frenchman in the gone ones of Napoleo.

Perhaps I would adore all they. But today, citizen of the world contemporary, I have to all as tyrannous. All good, pulguinha, you were successful, I you say, at last, I you say: ' ' Hitler would be a Davi, a Biblical hero, if it had lived at the time of this; perhaps Davi, one crpula, an ominous one, as well as Hitler, was born in century XX' '. (August Andres Passari, doctor psychiatrist and writer, author of ' ' Fragmentos of the Tempo' ' , artepaubrasil publishing company)

REALITY Conceptualization As it clarifies William Luijpen, ' ' all and any construction human being, either in science, either in the art, the philosophy or the religion, estimates or has as its starting point the Real. The act to question themselves on the direction of the life, from the reflexiva conscience, and to construct reality concepts (s) that it varies (m) position according to where if finds the citizen observing, are characteristic proper of the beings humanos' '. For W. Luijpen, the quarrel on the diversification of the realities and the variety of the worlds are associated with the one of the multiple truths, each one of these truths with its specific values in one determined context, not remaining degree or anteriority of one (scientific truth, for example) in relation ace others that are aesthetic or philosophical. W. Luijpen, Intr. to the existencial fenomenologia ' ' Reality, therefore, is an extremely complex concept, that deserves deepened philosophical reflections. After all, all construction human being, either in science, the art, the philosophy or the religion, works with the Real, or has in it its bedding or starting point (and of arrived).

Better saying she treats yourself, in last analysis, of if to question the direction of the life human being, life that, endowed with a reflexiva conscience, constructed its concepts of reality, from which if exerts in the world and if it multiplies, modifying to each moment the face of planeta.' ' Joo Francisco Duarte Jnior, Intr., 12 Joo Francisco Duarte Jnior defines types of Reality: 1.a Daily Reality that if all imposes we with its weight. It is the one that if can say reality par excellence, in which we move in them as fish in the water. It is based on intentions practical, that in last analysis, have to see with our survival. 2.a Scientific Reality is one ' ' reality of second ordem' ' : apia reality that if in that one where we day-by-day move in them in ours. The scientific constructions leave, inevitably, of our perception human being of the reality (daily reality).