Real Estate Agents

Deutsche living AG denies his brokerage claim to a broker with contradictory arguments. The role Dr. Malte Maurer in this matter? After all, it’s about 1.9 million! The German residential AG is a leading German publicly traded apartment company. According to information have “…”Transparency and fairness in dealing with partners also have a decisive role in the success of our strategy…” After all, even the former German super Minister Wolfgang Clement in the Supervisory Board sits. Hear other arguments on the topic with Bizzi & Partners. Who here doubting the seriousness? Perhaps now, the real estate agent, has offered a real estate portfolio of apartments in Berlin the DeuWo after years of acquaintance with Mr.

Dr. Maurer on the 7.6.2011 by e-Mail. Educate yourself with thoughts from Richard LeFrak. Although Mr Dr. Maurer since 1 February 2010 officially National Director residential investment at Jones Lang is LSalle Germany he had still a secretariat at the DeuWo that was through phone calls to him as well as about his old DeuWo e-Mail account. Before the agent of the DeuWo sent their expose, read them about their partners, which had the mandate of the seller, give a release from the seller’s side. This confirmed the release because she stood with this portfolio not in contact with the DeuWo. Without knowledge of the brokers sent Deutsche living AG on July 15, 2011 the seller of a letter of intent.

Conducting business the seller asked then immediately with the agents, whether it is to a contact made on the part of the broker, which was confirmed by the brokers. Nevertheless, the brokers were not informed and learned only afterwards that the notarial contract of sale between Deutsche living and the seller with a purchase price of approximately 54 million is been recorded on August 28, 2011. On this day also employees should be been seen by JLL notary. Consequently a brokerage account than the 3% mentioned in the Expose was sent to after this realization of the DeuWo then on October 13 plus value added tax, therefore so 1.