Greek Archives

Then in we ask, why ours antepassadosregistravam the information, that is, they drew in walls of caves? Jexistia at this time the concern to preserve the information for the geraesfuturas? Leading in consideration estesquestionamentos, would not be appearing at this moment one begins of archive 2? Because these registers and the concern in behind keeping these foramdescritas information that the thousand of years in grottos. The caves can be considered an archive, and entopodemos to affirm that the first slight knowledge of archive had appeared in the daily pay – history, due to existence of this type of information, before exactly of the invention of the writing. As You mark (2007) ' ' Historical Aorigem of the archives retraces to the beginning of the writing, in the civilizations doMdio East, has about 6 a thousand years atrs' '. The first archives had appeared deformed spontaneous in the palaces and the temples. Some of the main archives dAntiguidade are: Palace deEbla in the Syrian, Archive of the Temple of Medinet in Egypt in the Sc. XI B.C.

Hititas 3 had been the first paraarquivos peoples to construct a special building, in the Sc. XIV B.C. We can affirm that the author defends the thesis that osarquivos, in its origin, would be a natural and spontaneous phenomenon, since oaparecimento of the writing. With the writing it appeared the idea to keep, to congregate to eorganizar the existing supports of writing in the height. She can yourself be said that osprimeiros archives appear of natural way and intuitivamente.

Already Schellenberg (2006, P. 25) affirms que' ' The archives as institution, probably, had had origin in the antigacivilizao Greek. Between centuries V and IV B.C. when the guardavamseus athenians documents of value in the temple of the mother of deuses, that is, in the Metroon' '. Maso author does not present certainty in its theory where the archives could tersurgido in the civilization Greek.

Araguana Property

In this in case that we can affirm that a property in the areas noblest of the city, and located well it will have greater value in the real estate market; regarding the localization, Villaa says in them: ' ' … The first one is of the products in itself? the buildings, the streets, the squares, the infrastructure. The other is the value produced for the agglomeration. This value is given by the localization of the buildings, streets and squares, therefore to this localization that inserts in the agglomeration. The localization if presents as well as a value of use of …

' ' (VILLAA, 2001, P. 72). We notice previously in told facts that the State through its performance when implanting definitive equipment privileges nobler areas, giving it localization, that in turn &#039 increases its; ' value of troca' ' use e. Fact seen in the noble parts of Araguana, that its localization fruit of values previously cited, a it a bigger value in the real estate market. The State, in its municipal scale, only has as the one of its goals, infrastructure implantation in urban, that this process of implantation, it happens of form to privilege definitive areas for real estate pressure of the greater layers purchasing power, and promoters, aiming at with these improvements, the valuation, and consequently the increase of the price of the property of these areas. It is this performance differentiated in the space, they generate localizations differentiated in the urban space, and with different social content, regarding this Corra fact, says in them: In view of this intention the capitalist State creates mechanism that leads to the residential segregation and its ratification. Thus, the differentials of taxes territorial and land are a strong discriminante factor, affecting the price of land and of the property and, as consequence, happening in the social segregation: the groups of raised income more inhabit in located more expensive property in quarters where the price of the most raised land to.